★★★★★· Brisbane-based, working with teams across Australia· Fixed-price, always· 0433 345 000

Pharmaceutical reporting your leaders can trust — Power BI dashboards in Brisbane

Brisbane-based, operator-led reporting support for pharmaceuticals teams that need clearer KPIs, less manual reporting, and numbers the business can trust.

Live pharmaceuticals dashboard preview

A working illustration of the reporting we typically build for pharmaceuticals clients in Brisbane and Queensland. Numbers are illustrative — yours land in the same layout once we connect your data sources.

Loading dashboard preview…

Pharmaceuticals reporting in Brisbane and Queensland

Pharmaceutical reporting usually spans batch records, QA systems, validation documentation, ERP data, and finance reporting, with a high need for traceability and disciplined KPI definitions.

The numbers that decide a pharmaceuticals week - cost per unit, throughput and inventory accuracy - are produced by SQL Server, Oracle and SCADA, which were bought at different times to solve different problems and were never meant to be read together. So they get reconciled by hand, and the answer arrives after the shift it was supposed to inform.

We connect those sources directly, agree what each metric counts before anyone builds a visual, and hand regulated manufacturing and quality-led teams reporting that refreshes on its own. The measure of success is that the meeting opens on what to do, not on whether the figures are right.

The meeting this is built for

The monthly quality and operations review. QA presents deviation closure rates from one system. Production has batch cycle times from the MES. Finance has cost per batch from the ERP. None of the numbers align without manual reconciliation. This reporting is built so the site director walks into that meeting with a single integrated view of production compliance, quality performance, and cost drivers - and spends time on decisions, not data arguments.

Who this reporting is built for

Quality Assurance Manager

Cares about
deviation closure rates, CAPA effectiveness, and batch release timelines
Frustrated by
QA metrics spread across LIMS, deviation systems, and spreadsheets
Needs to decide
investigation priorities and audit preparation

Plant / Site Director

Cares about
production compliance, yield, and regulatory readiness
Frustrated by
manual GMP reporting and disconnected batch records
Needs to decide
production scheduling, resource allocation, and compliance actions

Operations Manager

Cares about
OEE, changeover time, and batch cycle time
Frustrated by
MES and ERP data that require manual reconciliation
Needs to decide
line efficiency priorities and shift planning

Supply Chain / Planning Manager

Cares about
batch availability, shelf life, and distribution compliance
Frustrated by
no single view of production schedule vs demand
Needs to decide
production prioritisation and inventory allocation

CFO / Finance Manager

Cares about
cost per batch, margin by product, and variance to budget
Frustrated by
disconnected cost data from production and quality systems
Needs to decide
manufacturing cost control and product line profitability

Regulatory / Compliance Lead

Cares about
audit trail completeness and traceability
Frustrated by
assembling compliance data manually before every audit
Needs to decide
compliance gap priorities and reporting structure

What's going wrong now

Deviation data is in one system. Batch data is in another. Neither feeds into leadership reporting.

Audit preparation means weeks of manual data assembly every time.

QA and production teams argue about the same numbers because they come from different sources.

Regulatory reporting is a manual exercise that risks human error.

Cost per batch is only known after month-end, too late to act on.

What changes after this is built

QA, production, and finance share one version of the truth across batch, deviation, and cost data.
Audit preparation shrinks from weeks to hours because the data is already structured and traceable.
Site leadership sees compliance status in real-time, not at the end of each reporting period.
Cost per batch is visible as production runs, not weeks after.
The monthly quality review starts with data, not with data preparation.

Common pharmaceuticals reporting problems

MES platforms and SCADA each hold part of the same answer and disagree on the total

OTIF and inventory accuracy are calculated differently by finance and operations, and both are defended

Reporting still depends on Excel workbooks, manual checks and copied values

There is no clean single view by site, line, shift and asset

Review meetings lose time validating the data before the decision can start

Stock turns arrives after the window in which anyone could have acted on it

Too much of the reporting lives with one person, or in one undocumented workbook

Existing Power BI reports are slow, stale, or quietly not trusted

Managers cannot drill into a number without asking someone to rebuild the report

Assembling pharmaceuticals reporting takes longer than reviewing it does

Planned versus actual is weak across shifts, lines, sites and assets

Supplier performance is visible per site but not comparable between them

We work with pharmaceuticals teams across Brisbane - Eight Mile Plains, Darra, Wacol and Herston - and across Queensland.

What changes

What this work typically achieves

Reporting time cut by more than half in a typical engagement
Cycles that ran for days completed in one
A stack of spreadsheets replaced by one connected model

What that usually looks like in Pharmaceuticals

Deviation closure cycle time reduced by 40%
Batch release reporting moved from 3-day manual preparation to automated daily view
Audit preparation time reduced from weeks to hours

What people notice day to day

QA uses the dashboard in every deviation review

Batch data referenced in regulatory audits

Site leadership checks compliance status before each governance meeting

Book a reporting clarity call

You'll leave with a written action plan: speed issues, KPI drift, governance gaps, and a practical 30-day fix path.

Systems and data sources we connect

Reporting friction often starts because the right data sits across disconnected platforms. We connect the sources that matter for pharmaceuticals reporting.

ERP and finance platforms

SAPOracleNetSuiteProntoMYOB AdvancedMicrosoft Dynamics 365InforLIMSdeviation and CAPA systemsbatch records

Operational and plant systems

MES platformsSCADAhistorian systemsCMMSquality logsdowntime trackersproduction spreadsheets

Data interfaces and files

SQL ServerCSV extractsExcel workbooksSharePoint listsAPI feedsPower Query staging tables

What we build for pharmaceuticals teams

Executive performance dashboards

A shared leadership view across revenue, margin, output, labour, and operational variance.

Daily operational reporting

Shift, line, site, or asset reporting that helps managers respond earlier.

Production and quality dashboards

Yield, scrap, downtime, batch, deviation, and throughput performance in one reporting model.

Inventory and supply reporting

Stock position, purchase visibility, supplier performance, and service risk tracking.

Maintenance reporting

Planned maintenance, breakdowns, backlog, and asset reliability reporting.

Finance and operations bridge reporting

A cleaner link between cost, production, service, and margin outcomes.

Key pharmaceuticals KPIs and decision metrics

Operational performance

  • OEE
  • throughput
  • downtime
  • yield
  • scrap
  • labour efficiency

Supply and service

  • OTIF
  • inventory accuracy
  • stock turns
  • supplier performance
  • backlog
  • schedule adherence

Financial impact

  • cost per unit
  • gross margin
  • variance to plan
  • working capital
  • maintenance cost
  • product profitability

What becomes easier after implementation

The value is not only in the dashboard or the data model. It is in what changes day to day once reporting stops being a source of friction.

Stock turns, supplier performance and backlog available without anyone assembling them first
One agreed definition of schedule adherence and cost per unit, holding across finance, operations and leadership
Less time spent preparing, checking and explaining pharmaceuticals reporting
A calmer rhythm around the shift handover, the weekly production review and month-end
Problems visible early enough to act on, rather than explained afterwards
Less dependence on one analyst, one workbook, or one undocumented process

Why Roar Data for pharmaceuticals reporting

Pharmaceutical reporting demands traceability, auditability, and precision. We have worked in regulated manufacturing environments where batch records, deviation data, and compliance reporting are not optional.

Brisbane pharma teams get reporting that connects QA, production, and finance - with KPI logic that holds up under audit.

The work is shaped by understanding how sites actually run, not just how the data is structured.

Pharmaceuticals reporting FAQs

Which systems can you connect Power BI to for pharmaceuticals reporting?
The ones you already run. For pharmaceuticals reporting that usually starts with ERP and finance platforms - Infor, LIMS, deviation and CAPA systems, batch records - alongside operational and plant systems, data interfaces and files. Where a system has no usable API we work from scheduled extracts.
Which pharmaceuticals reporting metrics do you model first?
We start with the numbers already argued about in your meetings, which for pharmaceuticals reporting generally fall into operational performance, supply and service, financial impact. That means agreeing exactly what variance to plan, working capital, maintenance cost, product profitability and OEE count, before anyone builds a visual. Two teams using one word for two different calculations is why most reporting quietly stops being trusted.
Can you fix an existing pharmaceuticals Power BI setup rather than rebuild it?
Often, yes. We review the model, the DAX and the refresh design, then say honestly which it is. A pharmaceuticals report that is slow because of one badly shaped relationship is a repair; one built on assumptions that no longer hold is cheaper to rebuild than to keep patching.
Can you report across multiple sites?
Yes - comparing across sites, lines, shifts and assets is one of the more common reasons regulated manufacturing and quality-led teams call us. The hard part is never the visuals, it is making each one measure the same thing so the comparison means something.
Do you need to understand pharmaceuticals reporting to build it?
Enough to ask the right questions. Pharmaceutical reporting usually spans batch records, QA systems, validation documentation, ERP data, and finance reporting, with a high need for traceability and disciplined KPI definitions. Reporting that ignores that produces technically correct dashboards nobody opens, so we start in your meetings rather than in Power BI.

Talk through your pharmaceuticals reporting

If your reporting still depends on manual work, spreadsheet fixes, or numbers people do not fully trust, we can map out a practical way forward.

You'll leave with a written action plan: speed issues, KPI drift, governance gaps, and a practical 30-day fix path.