★★★★★· Brisbane-based, working with teams across Australia· Fixed-price, always· 0433 345 000

Power BI dashboards for Professional Services teams in Brisbane

Brisbane-based, operator-led reporting support for professional services teams that need clearer KPIs, less manual reporting, and numbers the business can trust.

Live professional services dashboard preview

A working illustration of the reporting we typically build for professional services clients in Brisbane and Queensland. Numbers are illustrative — yours land in the same layout once we connect your data sources.

Loading dashboard preview…

Professional Services reporting in Brisbane and Queensland

Professional services reporting often breaks down between CRM, PSA, finance, utilisation, WIP, and project profitability, leaving leadership with lagging visibility.

On professional services work the questions are utilisation, earned value and gross margin, and the answers sit in site diaries, Aconex and accounts systems. Project data ages quickly, so a report assembled on Monday is describing a job that has already moved by Wednesday.

We build the model so cost, schedule and delivery reconcile against the same source of truth, and service delivery and professional teams can see a variance while there is still time to do something about it.

The meeting this is built for

The monthly practice review. Each practice lead presents utilisation and margin differently. The CFO has WIP from the finance system. HR has headcount from the HRIS. The managing partner cannot compare practice performance without asking for manual reconciliation. This reporting is built so each practice reports from the same dashboard - utilisation, margin, pipeline, and team performance - in a consistent format.

Who this reporting is built for

Managing Partner / CEO

Cares about
firm profitability, pipeline health, and client retention
Frustrated by
leadership reporting assembled from PSA, CRM, and finance manually
Needs to decide
practice investment, pricing strategy, and growth priorities

Practice / Division Lead

Cares about
team utilisation, project margin, and delivery quality
Frustrated by
billable and non-billable time data that does not connect to revenue cleanly
Needs to decide
team allocation, hiring, and client engagement approach

CFO / Finance Director

Cares about
WIP, debtors, and revenue recognition accuracy
Frustrated by
project, time, and billing data across multiple platforms
Needs to decide
cash management, write-off policy, and financial forecasting

Resource / Delivery Manager

Cares about
capacity planning, project profitability, and staff allocation
Frustrated by
no integrated view of project demand, staff availability, and skills
Needs to decide
resource assignment, contractor engagement, and pipeline readiness

Business Development / Sales Lead

Cares about
pipeline conversion, proposal win rate, and client growth
Frustrated by
CRM data that does not connect to delivered revenue or client profitability
Needs to decide
pursuit strategy, pricing, and client relationship focus

HR / People Partner

Cares about
turnover, engagement, and capability development
Frustrated by
people data disconnected from utilisation, project, and financial context
Needs to decide
retention strategy, development investment, and workforce planning

What's going wrong now

Each project reports status in a different format.

Cost to complete is unreliable because systems do not integrate.

The portfolio view requires manual consolidation.

Margin surprises appear at month-end, not during the project.

Resource allocation decisions are made with incomplete visibility.

What changes after this is built

Every project reports in the same format from the same system.
Cost to complete is reliable because project and finance data connect.
The portfolio view is automatic and always current.
Margin surprises are caught during the project, not at month-end.
Resource allocation decisions are informed by real utilisation data.

Common professional services reporting problems

SharePoint and document control logs each hold part of the same answer and disagree on the total

WIP and gross margin are calculated differently by finance and operations, and both are defended

Reporting still depends on Excel workbooks, manual checks and copied values

There is no clean single view by project, crew and cost centre

Review meetings lose time validating the data before the decision can start

Forecast cost to complete arrives after the window in which anyone could have acted on it

Too much of the reporting lives with one person, or in one undocumented workbook

Existing Power BI reports are slow, stale, or quietly not trusted

Managers cannot drill into a number without asking someone to rebuild the report

Assembling professional services reporting takes longer than reviewing it does

Status, cost, WIP and margin are not visible in one reliable view

Site teams keep separate trackers that never reconcile

We work with professional services teams across Brisbane - the CBD, Milton, Newstead and Toowong - and across Queensland.

What changes

What this work typically achieves

Reporting time cut by more than half in a typical engagement
Cycles that ran for days completed in one
A stack of spreadsheets replaced by one connected model

What that usually looks like in Professional Services

Utilisation reporting automated across practice groups
WIP and lock-up visibility improved across the firm
Partner reporting pack now consistent and automated

What people notice day to day

Utilisation checked before every resource allocation meeting

WIP reviewed in every partner meeting

Pipeline data referenced in every practice planning session

Book a reporting clarity call

You'll leave with a written action plan: speed issues, KPI drift, governance gaps, and a practical 30-day fix path.

Systems and data sources we connect

Reporting friction often starts because the right data sits across disconnected platforms. We connect the sources that matter for professional services reporting.

Project and delivery platforms

ProcoreAconexJobpacBuildxactHammertechproject cost systems

Commercial and finance systems

ERP platformsaccounts systemstimesheetsprocurement toolsvariation registersWIP schedules

Site and document sources

site diariesExcel trackersSharePointdocument control logsSQL databasesCSV exports

What we build for professional services teams

Project portfolio reporting

A consolidated view of status, risk, forecast, commercial performance, and delivery pressure.

Site and project dashboards

Daily and weekly visibility across cost, progress, labour, and schedule.

WIP and margin reporting

Cleaner reporting on revenue, cost to complete, forecast, and commercial variance.

Resource and utilisation dashboards

A practical view of team capacity, billability, and delivery load.

Procurement and subcontractor reporting

Visibility across commitments, procurement timing, supplier performance, and cost movement.

Executive review packs

Board and leadership reporting that removes manual assembly and repeated checking.

Key professional services KPIs and decision metrics

Project delivery

  • programme status
  • earned value
  • schedule variance
  • milestone completion
  • defect rate
  • time to close issues

Commercial performance

  • WIP
  • gross margin
  • forecast cost to complete
  • variation value
  • cash collection
  • project profitability

Resource and risk

  • utilisation
  • billable hours
  • subcontractor performance
  • safety incidents
  • days outstanding
  • pipeline conversion

What becomes easier after implementation

The value is not only in the dashboard or the data model. It is in what changes day to day once reporting stops being a source of friction.

Subcontractor performance, safety incidents and days outstanding available without anyone assembling them first
One agreed definition of pipeline conversion and programme status, holding across finance, operations and leadership
Less time spent preparing, checking and explaining professional services reporting
A calmer rhythm around the project review, the cost report and the monthly claim
Problems visible early enough to act on, rather than explained afterwards
Less dependence on one analyst, one workbook, or one undocumented process

Why Roar Data for professional services reporting

Professional services reporting often breaks down between CRM, PSA, finance, utilisation, WIP, and project profitability, leaving leadership with lagging visibility.

That is the environment the reporting has to survive, so we build it around how service delivery and professional teams actually work - what gets asked in the meeting, what has to reconcile, and what breaks when one person is on leave.

We are Brisbane-based and work across Queensland and the rest of Australia. For professional services that matters less for proximity than for availability: someone who will sit in the review where the numbers get argued about, rather than only in the handover.

The test is whether the reporting still gets opened six months later without us. If it needs a specialist to maintain, it was built wrong.

Professional Services reporting FAQs

Which systems can you connect Power BI to for professional services reporting?
The ones you already run. For professional services reporting that usually starts with project and delivery platforms - Jobpac, Buildxact, Hammertech and project cost systems - alongside commercial and finance systems, site and document sources. Where a system has no usable API we work from scheduled extracts.
Which professional services reporting metrics do you model first?
We start with the numbers already argued about in your meetings, which for professional services reporting generally fall into project delivery, commercial performance, resource and risk. That means agreeing exactly what subcontractor performance, safety incidents, days outstanding, pipeline conversion and programme status count, before anyone builds a visual. Two teams using one word for two different calculations is why most reporting quietly stops being trusted.
Can you fix an existing professional services Power BI setup rather than rebuild it?
Often, yes. We review the model, the DAX and the refresh design, then say honestly which it is. A professional services report that is slow because of one badly shaped relationship is a repair; one built on assumptions that no longer hold is cheaper to rebuild than to keep patching.
Can you report across multiple projects?
Yes - comparing across projects, programmes, crews and cost centres is one of the more common reasons service delivery and professional teams call us. The hard part is never the visuals, it is making each one measure the same thing so the comparison means something.
Do you need to understand professional services reporting to build it?
Enough to ask the right questions. Professional services reporting often breaks down between CRM, PSA, finance, utilisation, WIP, and project profitability, leaving leadership with lagging visibility. Reporting that ignores that produces technically correct dashboards nobody opens, so we start in your meetings rather than in Power BI.

Talk through your professional services reporting

If your reporting still depends on manual work, spreadsheet fixes, or numbers people do not fully trust, we can map out a practical way forward.

You'll leave with a written action plan: speed issues, KPI drift, governance gaps, and a practical 30-day fix path.