★★★★★· Brisbane-based, working with teams across Australia· Fixed-price, always· 0433 345 000

Power BI dashboards for Financial Services teams in Brisbane

Brisbane-based, operator-led reporting support for financial services teams that need clearer KPIs, less manual reporting, and numbers the business can trust.

Live financial services dashboard preview

A working illustration of the reporting we typically build for financial services clients in Brisbane and Queensland. Numbers are illustrative — yours land in the same layout once we connect your data sources.

Loading dashboard preview…

Financial Services reporting in Brisbane and Queensland

Financial services reporting often cuts across product, customer, risk, compliance, finance, and service delivery data that rarely lands in one usable model on its own.

Days to close, gross margin and customer retention are the figures a board actually asks about, and they are assembled from Excel workbooks, Oracle and budget models. When that assembly is manual, the pack is accurate on the day it is built and stale by the time it is read, and any question that was not anticipated waits until next month.

We model those sources once so the definitions hold across finance, operations and leadership, and financial services and regulated commercial teams can follow a number down to the transaction that caused it without commissioning a new report.

The meeting this is built for

The quarterly review meeting. Each adviser presents client and portfolio data differently. Compliance has breach data from one system. Finance has revenue data from another. The practice principal cannot see adviser productivity, client health, and compliance status in one place. This reporting is built so the practice reviews all three - productivity, clients, and compliance - from one dashboard.

Who this reporting is built for

CEO / Managing Director

Cares about
AUM growth, client retention, and practice efficiency
Frustrated by
portfolio and client data across multiple platforms
Needs to decide
growth strategy, product focus, and operational investment

Head of Advice / Practice Principal

Cares about
adviser productivity, client portfolio health, and compliance
Frustrated by
client, product, and compliance data in separate systems
Needs to decide
adviser development, client segmentation, and service model

CFO / Finance Director

Cares about
revenue per adviser, margin by service line, and cost control
Frustrated by
financial reporting that requires manual consolidation
Needs to decide
pricing, cost management, and financial planning

Compliance / Risk Manager

Cares about
regulatory obligations, breach reporting, and audit readiness
Frustrated by
compliance data manually assembled from advice and client records
Needs to decide
compliance priorities, remediation actions, and process improvements

Operations / BDM Lead

Cares about
client onboarding efficiency, referral pipeline, and growth
Frustrated by
CRM and operations data that do not connect to financial outcomes
Needs to decide
process improvement, marketing spend, and business development

Investment / Portfolio Lead

Cares about
portfolio performance, risk exposure, and asset allocation
Frustrated by
investment data from custodians and platforms in different formats
Needs to decide
asset allocation, manager selection, and client reporting

What's going wrong now

Each department presents performance differently.

The board pack takes days to assemble from multiple sources.

Definitions change between reporting periods.

The executive team cannot self-serve without requesting analysis.

Financial and operational data never align on first review.

What changes after this is built

The board pack builds itself from the same data leadership uses daily.
Each department reports from the same dashboard with the same definitions.
The executive team self-serves performance data without requesting analysis.
Financial and operational data connect in one view.
Reporting definitions are locked and consistent period to period.

Common financial services reporting problems

payroll systems and procurement tools each hold part of the same answer and disagree on the total

Revenue growth and customer retention are calculated differently by finance and operations, and both are defended

Reporting still depends on Excel workbooks, manual checks and copied values

There is no clean single view by entity, business unit and portfolio

Review meetings lose time validating the data before the decision can start

Pipeline value arrives after the window in which anyone could have acted on it

Too much of the reporting lives with one person, or in one undocumented workbook

Existing Power BI reports are slow, stale, or quietly not trusted

Managers cannot drill into a number without asking someone to rebuild the report

Assembling financial services reporting takes longer than reviewing it does

Board and investor packs still depend on spreadsheet assembly

Leadership cannot move from the summary to the cause quickly enough

We work with financial services teams across Brisbane - the CBD, Newstead, Spring Hill and Toowong - and across Queensland.

What changes

What this work typically achieves

Reporting time cut by more than half in a typical engagement
Cycles that ran for days completed in one
A stack of spreadsheets replaced by one connected model

What that usually looks like in Financial Services

Adviser productivity reporting automated
Client portfolio health visible across the practice
Compliance reporting preparation reduced by 50%

What people notice day to day

Used in every board meeting

Leadership self-serves without requesting analysis

Pack preparation is now hours, not days

Book a reporting clarity call

You'll leave with a written action plan: speed issues, KPI drift, governance gaps, and a practical 30-day fix path.

Systems and data sources we connect

Reporting friction often starts because the right data sits across disconnected platforms. We connect the sources that matter for financial services reporting.

Core finance and planning systems

SAPOracleNetSuiteXeroMYOBDynamics 365 Finance

Commercial and operational inputs

CRM platformsbudget modelspayroll systemsprocurement toolsbanking filesboard pack workbooks

Reporting data sources

Excel workbooksSQL databasesSharePoint filesflat-file uploadsPower BI datasetsAPI connectors

What we build for financial services teams

Executive scorecards

A sharper leadership view across revenue, margin, cash, operational health, and accountability.

Board reporting packs

Reduce manual preparation and improve consistency across monthly and quarterly packs.

Financial and operational bridge reporting

Bring finance and operating drivers into one reliable view.

Entity, portfolio, or business unit comparison

Make it easier to compare performance on a like-for-like basis.

Forecast versus actual tracking

Expose variance sooner and improve management conversation quality.

KPI governance dashboards

Create a practical structure around definitions, ownership, and accountability.

Key financial services KPIs and decision metrics

Executive performance

  • EBITDA
  • gross margin
  • cash flow
  • budget variance
  • working capital
  • return on capital

Business drivers

  • revenue growth
  • customer retention
  • pipeline value
  • operating cost
  • service performance
  • forecast accuracy

Governance and control

  • days to close
  • board pack cycle time
  • data quality issues
  • KPI ownership
  • overdue actions
  • risk indicators

What becomes easier after implementation

The value is not only in the dashboard or the data model. It is in what changes day to day once reporting stops being a source of friction.

Pipeline value, operating cost and service performance available without anyone assembling them first
One agreed definition of forecast accuracy and days to close, holding across finance, operations and leadership
Less time spent preparing, checking and explaining financial services reporting
A calmer rhythm around the monthly pack, the quarterly review and the board meeting
Problems visible early enough to act on, rather than explained afterwards
Less dependence on one analyst, one workbook, or one undocumented process

Why Roar Data for financial services reporting

Financial services reporting often cuts across product, customer, risk, compliance, finance, and service delivery data that rarely lands in one usable model on its own.

That is the environment the reporting has to survive, so we build it around how financial services and regulated commercial teams actually work - what gets asked in the meeting, what has to reconcile, and what breaks when one person is on leave.

We are Brisbane-based and work across Queensland and the rest of Australia. For financial services that matters less for proximity than for availability: someone who will sit in the review where the numbers get argued about, rather than only in the handover.

The test is whether the reporting still gets opened six months later without us. If it needs a specialist to maintain, it was built wrong.

Financial Services reporting FAQs

Which systems can you connect Power BI to for financial services reporting?
The ones you already run. For financial services reporting that usually starts with core finance and planning systems - NetSuite, Xero, MYOB and Dynamics 365 Finance - alongside commercial and operational inputs, reporting data sources. Where a system has no usable API we work from scheduled extracts.
Which financial services reporting metrics do you model first?
We start with the numbers already argued about in your meetings, which for financial services reporting generally fall into executive performance, business drivers, governance and control. That means agreeing exactly what data quality issues, KPI ownership, overdue actions, risk indicators and EBITDA count, before anyone builds a visual. Two teams using one word for two different calculations is why most reporting quietly stops being trusted.
Can you fix an existing financial services Power BI setup rather than rebuild it?
Often, yes. We review the model, the DAX and the refresh design, then say honestly which it is. A financial services report that is slow because of one badly shaped relationship is a repair; one built on assumptions that no longer hold is cheaper to rebuild than to keep patching.
Can you report across multiple business units?
Yes - comparing across business units, entities and portfolios is one of the more common reasons financial services and regulated commercial teams call us. The hard part is never the visuals, it is making each one measure the same thing so the comparison means something.
Do you need to understand financial services reporting to build it?
Enough to ask the right questions. Financial services reporting often cuts across product, customer, risk, compliance, finance, and service delivery data that rarely lands in one usable model on its own. Reporting that ignores that produces technically correct dashboards nobody opens, so we start in your meetings rather than in Power BI.

Talk through your financial services reporting

If your reporting still depends on manual work, spreadsheet fixes, or numbers people do not fully trust, we can map out a practical way forward.

You'll leave with a written action plan: speed issues, KPI drift, governance gaps, and a practical 30-day fix path.